Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.


Texas lawmakers are continuing to push for first responders’ rights to carry guns while on duty. This has been a long time in the making

Next week, a hearing will be held at the Texas Capitol for a bill that would finally allow firemen and emergency personnel to carry on duty.

It is their second amendment right and should able to use it if ever it is necessary. Considering that there have been an increasing number of firefighters and first responders shot when arriving at the scene of a fire or accident, this could really benefit them.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?

  • Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Keep and Bear updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The decision for first responders to carry is currently up for the local government.

Advocates for arming first responders will frequently point to a particular case. In 2012 someone in Rochester, New York actually set a fire just to lure first responders into an ambush. Four firefighters were hit. Two of them died. That’s why Texas lawmakers want all first responders — including volunteers — to be able to carry a gun to defend themselves.

But local medics worry that arriving at a call armed might cost them their hard-earned reputation. Capt. Darren Noak works for Austin-Travis County EMS. He notes, “We’re there to help and we don’t want that image to be blurred or that line to be crossed even if it’s just a perception.”

That’s not to say the work isn’t dangerous. A survey by the National Association of EMTs finds just more that half of all medics reported being assaulted by a patient sometime in their career. But Noak counters that carrying a gun would present its own set of problems. “It’s protecting that weapon,” he says, “It’s worrying about that weapon. So it’s a whole other stress level, it’s a whole other issue that we just don’t feel is a good fit for our system.”

And local EMS feel they have good cooperation with the police and sheriff. Noak explains, “There’s a lot of times, a lot of call types where they not only respond concurrently with us but a lot of times they’ll go in first and clear the scene and then make sure it’s a safe environment for our medics to approach the scene.”

But that’s life in the big city. Local first responders concede they can see where volunteers in rural areas might find themselves in dangerous situations with law enforcement miles away. So the question before state lawmakers is who gets to make the call on whether they can carry a gun on duty—the first responder or the local officials they answer to.

So give these people who put their lives on the line a chance to protect themselves too! There isn’t always a police officer around to save them.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Become an Insider!

Enter your email address below to stay in the loop and read our latest and greatest updates!

Send this to a friend