Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.


A new Nevada bill has been proposed that would allow criminals to sue people who protect themselves. This completely violates our rights.

If an intruder comes into my home, I am going to shoot him. I will not put myself or my family’s lives at risk for a criminal.

Current law in Nevada (Nevada Revised Statue 41.095) states that civil liability immunity is granted to a person who defends them from an attacker. They are not legally responsible for any injuries the attacker sustains from the incident.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?

  • Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Keep and Bear updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Leave it to Democratic senators to try to change this. They do ted to protect the thugs of society.

2ANews reports:

Under the proposed legislation, a rapist who breaks into a woman’s bedroom would be allowed to sue the woman if she fights back and injures the rapist . Similarly, a father who defends his family during a violent home invasion could be sued by the attackers .

Essentially, the proposed legislation leaves victims with only two choices: self defense, which could result in a costly lawsuit, or huddling quietly with their family in the corner while criminals do what they wish in their home.

The bill represents yet another attempt by liberal lawmakers to undermine a principal of self-defense known as the “castle doctrine” . The “castle doctrine” is a self-defense doctrine, typically outlined within a law, that designates a person’s home, as well as any legally occupied place such as a vehicle, as a place in which a person may use force to defend oneself against an attacker. Such laws provide the victim with immunity from legal prosecution that might result from their defense of their life. The term is most commonly used in the United States, though many other countries have similar principles in their laws.

So what it sounds like to me, is that Nevada carriers better no miss when they shoot, so that the criminal isn’t alive to shoot.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Become an Insider!

Enter your email address below to stay in the loop and read our latest and greatest updates!

Send this to a friend