Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.


The bleeding heart liberals are at it again, employing their emotionally-exploitative narratives in order to influence the young minds of America.

The left’s undying reliance on the youth vote is fairly simple to understand.  As children living under our parents’ roof, we are part of a socialist system.  Our meals, shelter, clothing, and education are provided to us, free of charge.  During the transitional time between high school and a career, when our young people are supposedly thinking for themselves and being challenged by higher education, they are still working under an entitlement system of sorts.  While they will eventually end up paying for the classes, meals, and dormitory lodging, they don’t quite see it yet.  They have already borrowed against their name to stay “afloat” through the process, and have yet to fiscally grow up.

As they do, they become increasingly conservative if left to think for themselves.  This is why it is imperative that the left gets to them while they are still young, and living the Bohemian, pseudo-socialist lifestyle.

Now, those who do become trapped in the left’s social justice snare, have the opportunity to grow into positions of power within this glorious country, and they are then able to spread this sideways rhetoric legally.  For instance, in the case of Massachusetts’ district court judges, who recently announced that they don’t see any reason why an “assault” gun ban would be unconstitutional.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?

  • Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Keep and Bear updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a complaint against the state’s “assault weapons” ban on Friday and expressly described similar bans as constitutional.

The court explained its decision to dismiss the complaint by stating that “the AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms.’”

Because a ban on the AR-15 and “large capacity magazines” is, in its opinion, constitutional, the court ruled that the question of whether a ban exists is one to be decided by legislatures, not judges.

Apparently Massachusetts’ court system has a psychic connection to the ghosts of the Founding Fathers, and were given this magical interpretation of what “bearing arms” is all about.

Maybe these liberal lunatics should take a look at another, not so abstract interpretation…this time of the word infringe.

second amendment

By limiting the type of weapons that can be owned, Massachusetts is, by definition, infringing upon the Second Amendment.

And, for the record, the definition of infringe hasn’t changed over the course of the last 240 years.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Become an Insider!

Enter your email address below to stay in the loop and read our latest and greatest updates!

Send this to a friend